The very rich obviously believe themselves to be better than normal people. Whether they actually built the base of their riches, lucked onto them, or inherited them, they are, to themselves, obviously the chosen ones. Their opinions should be sought and followed as their needs are catered to beyond the wealthy of any other time in human history. Against this wealth and power and all of the rules stacked against us, one might think that we might as well quit now, or become toadies like politicians and business people around the world.
There is one glimmer of hope though – nothing causes carelessness more than hubris, and often, it seems that each successive generation of the rich are more pampered and fail to ever think for themselves, and thus, stupider than the previous generation.
The other day I wrote about the greed and stupidity of Daniel Snyder, owner of the Washington Commanders, but his parents weren’t especially rich, although he did attend private schools. In the earlier article I mentioned the ridiculous tirade performed by Rocky Wirtz, the owner of the Chicago Blackhawks whose grandfather bought the team and father inherited before Rocky. It was only a couple of days before another spoiled rich kid would insert his foot into his mouth.
This week is the annual rite of spring and nearly national holiday called Opening Day, which means that all of the owners of the Major League Baseball suddenly come out from their homes and yachts to suddenly take the spotlight. The oldest baseball franchise and historically the first to open the season are the Cincinnati Reds, and the team’s President and COO Phil Castellini needed to express his opinions publicly before the first pitch. The Reds sold off most of their best players over the past year and along with the owners’ lockout of the players which shortened spring training and delayed the start of the season by a week, are about as popular in Cincinnati as L.A. Rams fans showing up at a Bengals game.
Castellini, son of Reds owner Bob Castellini, was asked in a pregame 700-WLW radio interview about why fans should remain loyal after the organization lowered player payroll during the offseason. The Reds haven’t won a playoff series since 1995 and have only five winning seasons since Castellini’s ownership group bought the team in 2006. He opened his mouth and said, “Well, where are you going to go? Sell the team to who? That’s the other thing: You want to have this debate? …. What would you do with this team to have it more profitable, make more money, compete more in the current economic system that this game exist? It would be to pick it up and move it somewhere else. Be careful what you ask for.”
The backlash was quick and furious. Sports writers and broadcasters in every US market including ESPN jumped in to say that this was an incredibly stupid statement, especially since Reds fans are among the more passionate and loyal. By Tuesday night, the younger Castellini issued an apology: “I apologize to Reds fans and regret the comments that I made earlier today. We love this city, we love this team, and we love our fans. I understand how our fans feel and I am sorry.”
Sports owners walk a very fine line, having to make business decisions that are public to every sports fan, reader and sports radio listener. Most owners bought their teams to 1) play real life fantasy sports, and 2) become famous so that they get their names and likenesses in the paper regularly. What many don’t understand is, that while they “own” the team financially, they have a unwritten bond with the fans, who “own” the team through buying tickets and jerseys and parking and food. As much as the owners want to ignore the fans, it is the fans’ money that run the team, that pay the players and front offices. Some owners, not many, are beloved by their fan base (only ones I can think of are the Rooneys who own the Steelers in Pittsburgh). The others can find their popularity fluctuate like a feather in a tornado (like Rocky Wirtz – loved during the Stanley Cup Championships, now a pariah) or just outright hated like Snyder. Owners believe that they are invulnerable – they can’t be forced to sell, and like the younger Castellini said, untouchable by the fans. Except owners have been forced to sell (Donald Sterling and the Los Angeles Clippers, and perhaps Snyder soon), or have been blacklisted by the fans and more importantly taxpayers who they want new stadiums from. I think of the old Minnesota North Stars, whose owner Norm Green failed to convince politicians to give him a new stadium. At first, he wanted to move to Anaheim, but Disney had already agreed with the league to create the Mighty Ducks. Green moved the team to Dallas, where they remain, but the moving trucks hadn’t made it to Texas before the hockey mad Minnesotans had begun funding a new stadium and petitioning the NHL for a team. The Wild have been there ever since.
Can baseball punish the Castellinis? Not much even though baseball suspended former Reds’ owner Marge Schott. Maybe Daddy will step in and either take over, or order his son to keep his mouth shut and stay away from public appearances, especially to the ballpark. Maybe fans will organize and stay away? Refuse to give the team any money, like Blackhawk fans did back in the 1990s? It wasn’t until “Dollar” Bill Wirtz died and Rocky took over that old, stubborn policies ended and the team started winning. Can the Reds do this? Will they? Will it matter to a pissed off fan base?

There is more often no love between professional sports owners and the fans; and they already are disliked by the players who are often at odds with them over collective bargaining agreements. Owners try to conduct civic blackmail for new stadiums and tax cuts, charge huge amounts of money for tickets, parking, personal seat licenses, not to mention food and drinks. And they often make bad decisions about their teams, GMs, managers.
Just this year, we’ve had the owners of the Cleveland Browns Jimmy and Dee Haslam defending the gigantic trade they made to get troubled quarterback Deshaun Watson from Texas, saying that they did an extensive investigation on the allegations that Watson committed sexual assault against 22 massage parlor workers. None of the workers nor their lawyer have been interviewed. So far, there have been no criminal charges sticking, being denied by two Texas Grand Juries, but civil trials await the QB along with a probable NFL suspension. All the while, he has pocketing a guaranteed $250 million contract that pays him $54,000 per game this upcoming season so he will only lose that amount per game if he’s suspended.
Jump cut to Blackhawks owner Rocky Wirtz, who at a press conference scheduled to address changes in the team’s culture and controls angrily refused to answer any questions about the response to the sexual abuse and cover-up performed by a video coach. The event wasn’t questioned, just want changes had been made in controls so it wouldn’t happen again. Of course, Wirtz’s dad “Dollar” Bill was hated by most of the fan base for his money pinching ways. Just in Chicago, we have an ownership who may be to the right of 1963 George Wallace (Cubs), an ownership family that has mismanaged its team for decades and who are more concerned about building a new stadium in Arlington Heights than building a winner (Bears). Only the owner of the Bulls and White Sox is not held in contempt at this time (although many people will never forgive him for holding Illinois hostage to build U.S. Cellular/Guaranteed Rate field).
As bad as a group that includes Jerry Jones, the Griffiths of the Twins, the late George Steinbrenner, it is possible that the owner of the Washington Commanders Daniel Snyder. Already, Snyder fought for many years pressure to change the old politically incorrect Redskins, before changing the nickname to something cool (“Washington Football Team”) then something stupid (“the Commanders”). The PR debacle is a drop in the bucket compared to the fact that the team has been under investigation for condoning sexual harassment of cheerleaders and other women. Snyder himself has been implicated in sexual impropriety. Now, he now has Congress and perhaps the other owners hating him too.
The Washington Post is reporting that the U.S. House Oversight Committee has sent a 20-page letter to the Federal Trade Commission saying Snyder and the Commanders “may have engaged in troubling, long-running, and potentially unlawful pattern of financial conduct.” The allegations state Snyder and the NFL’s D.C. franchise underreported ticket revenue from the NFL, which means that he is cheating the other owners of their share of revenues from home games. They also state Snyder and the Commanders had two sets of books, one of which was used to underreport ticket revenue. Fans have been cheated too. The letter states that as much as $5 million in “refundable deposits from season ticket holders” was also potentially withheld.
Snyder, like the other owners are fabulously wealthy. Yet, it is no surprise to me that he is ripping off the season ticket holders. We fans are the sheep to be fleeced of our money. It does surprise me that he is willing to screw his fellow owners. In the socialistic world at the top of the NFL, all of the money is split between the teams – TV revenue all the way down to tickets, and we’re talking about billions of dollars. The Tribune Company Cubs got in similar trouble when the team set up a ticket brokerage to scalp their own tickets. Like Snyder, this revenue was off the books, not shared with opposing teams.
Considering the fact that it has been contemplated that the NFL might force Snyder out in Washington as a result of the sexual allegations if proven. That Congress was brought in to investigate Snyder’s finances because his team is in the Nation’s Capital, is another embarrassment to the league. The one thing the owners do not want is investigations into their books (except of course for the publicly held Packers). Now, he’s cheating the other owners out of revenue, and the owners are a vicious bunch. While the NFL has never forced an ownership change, the Los Angeles Clippers being taken away from the repulsive Donald Sterling sets a precedent.
All sports fans think that the owners of their local team(s) are the worst, cheapest, most deplorable people on earth, Dan Snyder may have them all beat.

Sorry for not posting more frequently – lots of work and stuff happening.
For the past few weeks, I have wanted to post something about Deshaun Watson. Officials in Houston announced that Watson would not be subject to criminal charges despite the 22 civil lawsuits filed against him by women who work in massage parlors being shown his private parts. As soon as it was announced that Watson wouldn’t be going to jail (at this point anyway), the bidding began. The Buccaneers, Falcons, Panthers and Saints were all inquiring as to Watson’s availability. This offseason will likely be known as the Time of The Quarterback shuffle. Rodgers staying put; Russell Wilson taking his show on the road to Denver, the musical chairs of starting QBs has been dizzying.
Finally, over the weekend came the news that Watson would be traded to the Cleveland Browns for the whopping hail to the Texans of first round draft picks in 2022, 2023 and 2024 along with a 2023 third round pick and 2022 and 2024 fourth rounders. Of course, the Texans are in full rebuilding mode and have been since they traded all of their other major stars. Of course, the team has been so mismanaged for so long, one has to say that just because you have picks mean that you do good things with them (see Akili Smith, Ryan Leaf and other majestic busts).
What is truly dishonorable about this is the behavior of the Browns. Of course, they traded for a player who is likely to face some suspension from the NFL in the coming season. So what do they do? Sign him to a $230 million contract ALL GUARANTEED, and the biggest travesty is that in the first year, he gets paid $57,000 per game, which means that if he is suspended, that is all he will lose. On a football note, the ripples went out – the first loser is Baker Mayfield, who officially knew that he is not the man in Cleveland. Atlanta being in the mix said it all to it’s long time QB Matt Ryan, who wanted out and will now play in Indianapolis.
Of course, this is not the biggest message sent by the Browns. This is an affront to every woman and anyone who knows that the odds of people who actually get jail time for sexual assault is so miniscule to be nonexistent. Worse is that most of the teams would have done the same thing. Winning which begets money is the only important thing (meanwhile Colin Kaepernick can’t even get a tryout). What message does this send? The message that women should not be believed since men accused of sexual misconduct mostly get off with little or no penalties. In today’s America, foreign women are held in even less esteem. The women are reportedly mainly Asian, another marginalized group of people.
The owners show themselves to be completely tone deaf to public opinion. Once the trade was finalized on Sunday, Owner Jimmy Haslam released a statement so unbelievable that he obviously thinks that the whole world is stupid. First, the statement says that they did extensive research into the civil suits. Hard to say that there’s much of an study being done when none of the women or their attorney were interviewed. The statement said “(w)e (Haslam and his wife Dee) are acutely aware and empathetic to the highly personal sentiments expressed about this decision.” Empathetic? Is the fact that the Browns have never been to a Super Bowl have something to do with it?
This whole incident is another black eye to the NFL and smells like a polluted river at low tide. Anyone and everyone who participated in this whole sad, sick, cynical incident should be ashamed of themselves. It makes this NFL fan feel like he needs a shower; one that lasts for weeks to get rid of the stench.

With baseball on lockout and prospects for a quick settlement fading day by day, the NFL has happily filled the void somewhat. This past weekend featured the NFL Draft Combine, otherwise known as 21st Century slave review. College athletes who have listed for the April draft are measured, prodded, everything except having their tongues reviewed like horses. But there’s a bigger story in football – the quarterback shuffle…
Since this time last year, the fate of Aaron Rodgers has been one of the hot button topics in sports. Rodgers said that he was upset at the Packers’ front office since using a first-round draft choice to draft his successor, Jordan Love. Along with the pain of consecutive 13-win seasons without even a Super Bowl appearance, Rodgers said that he wanted out of Green Bay. The Packers have since tried everything to get on Rodgers’ good side including covering up for him not being vaccinated against COVID-19, subjecting his teammates to risk infection, and of course, his sudden, weird, now defunct engagement to equally strange actress Sharleen Woodley.
The teams in the NFC North of course, were rooting for Rodgers to be traded or retire. The Packers once again lost in the playoffs, and after this season, Rodgers said he would decide on his future before the draft. Yesterday, it was announced that the Packers had signed Rodgers to a new contract worth $200 million for four years with $158 million guaranteed, the biggest contract ever in the sport.
It was believed that the Broncos, Steelers and perhaps Dolphins were the hottest suitors for Rodgers, since there was no way that the Packers would trade Rodgers to a team in their conference, much less their division. I guess the Broncos were very serious about Rodgers because, after news reports confirmed the Rodgers’ signing, the Broncos put together a deal to get Russell Wilson from the Seahawks. It is unclear how many players and draft choices will be heading northwest, but Seattle is an aging franchise who is not a Super Bowl contender anymore, and so a lot of help is needed. Wilson has expressed his dissatisfaction with the team not getting better linemen to protect him, but reports were that Head Coach Pete Carroll did not want to trade Wilson. Of course, Carroll is 70 years old, and may either want to retire or get pushed out.
Overall, the trade reminds me of the Herschel Walker Trade from the Cowboys to the Vikings. Walker is a Hall of Fame running back, but had a lot of mileage on his tires, as it were. The Cowboys took those picks and used them to acquire players like Emmitt Smith, Darren Woodson and Russell Maryland, the foundation for it’s 1990s Super Bowl teams. The Vikings never made the Super Bowl in that time period and Walker retired (and has become a GOP right wing candidate for Congress).
Denver of course, has had some very good defenses these past few years and some decent skill position players, but no QB to run the show. Assuming he passes the physical and agrees to the trade, Wilson will be coming into a good situation, much like Peyton Manning did after leaving the Colts for the Mile High City. And Wilson now makes the star-studded AFC even tougher with Allen, Mahomes, and other QBs.
The only question now is who’s next? There are no elite QBs coming out of college this draft, so that leaves some others like Derek Carr reportedly available. And there are the same old retreads like Andy Daulton hanging around. One has to wonder whether Jordan Love, Rodgers’ heir apparent is available?

Yes, there is war in Ukraine and inflation and the usual political divide in the country, and what would cheer everyone up? I always use the arrival of pitchers and catchers to spring training as evidence that we have made it through the winter and warmer days are ahead. Unfortunately, there is no baseball or joy in Mudville as the owners’ lockout of the players continues as both sides attempt to negotiate a new collective bargaining agreement.
I remember a few years ago when MLB and the Union celebrated 25 years of labor peace, the longest time without a work stoppage since the Andy Messersmith free agency decision. The sides appeared to be friendly. Well, all that goodwill is gone. The last CBA had provisions that were definitely owner friendly and with the pandemic, player salaries have actually fallen on average. One wouldn’t think so with the quarter and half billion dollar contracts going to the superstars, which the owners were hoping would 1) split the players between the super rich and the rest of the rank and file; and 2) get the fans on their side.
As always, both sides are at fault and mostly it is a victim of the current political environment. Compromise is seen as weakness, complete victory is the only outcome valued by anyone. The owners established the lockout, designed to play hardball with the Players’ Union and the few negotiating sessions were futile until the owners set a deadline of this past Monday or the start of the season was in jeopardy. I really thought that the sudden flurry of sessions would save the season at the last hour, especially with the arbitrary deadline. Then they extended the deadline by 24 hours and after a nearly nonstop sessions on Monday and Tuesday, the owners cancelled Opening Day and the first two series to put the pressure on the players. Instead it appears that this has brought the players solidarity and both sides are going into the nuclear bunkers.
The major problem of course is whether people will care. Baseball’s demographic skews very old and the game continues to be very slow which has the League thinking hard about ways to speed up the game. Some were ridiculous like starting runners at second base in extra innings, which was quickly eliminated, and universal DH, which I liked a great deal. Still, the ideas haven’t worked and the sport is in real danger of disappearing, which a prolonged labor problem definitely will not help.
It just goes to show that people never learn. This is going to go on for awhile, and honestly, baseball is the only sports show in town from mid-June when the NBA and NHL end to mid-August, when the NFL camps open. Baseball is no longer the national pastime, to many young people it is a boring anachronism. Can these reportedly “titans of industry” and the very talented players decide to compromise or are they going to blow up the season? I’m not hopeful…

A comedian I follow on social media asked a very good question as the Winter Olympics begin in earnest – the Games were a big thing growing up and they’re not this year. Why is that? I think there are a number of reasons why this Olympics does not have the same excitement as in years past:
Let’s start with the obvious one – Covid-19. Even though the Omicron variant seems to be losing strength, that was not the case in the build-up of this Olympiad. There was legitimate concern as to whether the Games would be a super-spreader event. The NHL and Players’ Union pulled the pro players from the Games (although I like a return to the amateurs playing, especially since the pandemic ended the IIHF World Championships that are held around Christmas/New Year). One would think that this would be enough, but there’s more…
The Games are being held in China. Many people cannot separate the Games with the government that my friend Neil Steinberg of the Chicago Sun-Times listed in his column this morning: oppression of the Uyghur population; crackdown on Hong Kong; long time attempts to grasp Taiwan; it’s hold on Tibet; and a two-year-old trade war. Not to mention being one of the first outbreaks of the before mentioned Covid. As Neil stated, it isn’t the best time to be publicizing where the Games are being held.
Which leads us to the modern Games. With so many billions of dollars in “white elephant” stadiums, venues that cost lots of money that could have been used on more important things like food, shelter, education, health, to see them deteriorated, never used again, like ghosts, governments are declining to jump on the Olympic bandwagon. With the terms rigged that the International Olympic Committee getting most of the revenue without risking money themselves. Then leaving when the 3 weeks are over; it is a sham. However, institutionalized state governments, where opposition is crushed, can spend all the money they wish on lavish games with no one to complain. It’s more important to provide a positive spin on life in the country, especially hiding the ugly aspects as propaganda to the rest of the world. Knowledgeable people are not falling for this.
Finally, this isn’t the 1960s and 1970s. In those days, athletes from Soviet Pact countries were rumors. We in the West heard about them and how great they were, and the Olympics were the only way to see them compete, and against the best from the rest of the world. For example, the Soviet Hockey Teams were incredible but we got to see them only in the Olympics or special series like the Canada Cup. Today of course, all one has to do to see the best Russian hockey players is watch the NHL: Ovetchkin is in Washington; Artemi Panerin plays for the Rangers; there’s lots more. Skiers, bobsledders, can be found on American television if you look around. Yes, the competition may not be as high as the Olympics, but they are no longer myths and legends only talked about among fans.
Coming back to the beginning, the anti-Asian hate and xenophobia that has come more out in the open over the past few years in America and elsewhere may also be playing a part. And, in my opinion, the Winter Games are not as popular as the Summer Games. The Summer Games are older by decades; it has not been proven that the Winter Games are very popular in countries nearer the Equator where there is little to no winter (at least before climate change).
For quite a while, I have asked here at evilopinion.com whether the Olympics will soon be a thing of the past? With municipalities and countries no longer bidding for games; perhaps the need for permanent locations of the Games – Greece for the Summer Games and some place with proper weather and mountains for the Games would be the way to go? That way, the buildings and facilities get reused and can be the location for other events in between Olympiads.
I admit that I will watch some of the Olympics – it’s in my DNA. Will it be less than in years past? Perhaps. I wonder what the final ratings will be?

What happens when you really love something, a work of art, a film, a television show or a sports franchise that is/was created, cast with or owned by someone you find disreputable, even evil? In the social media age, and with more sophisticated ways of finding information, people’s exploits, positive and negative are grist for the proverbial mill.
A dear friend, the late Rebecca Watson, who had been in the movie industry in her youth, and I would get into intense arguments about Roman Polanski and Woody Allen (never heated arguments and it’s one of the things I miss about her most). Polanski of course had sex with an underaged girl in the early 1970s and has not been in the U.S. since. Polanski directed the classic “Chinatown” and “The Pianist” among other films and was the husband of Sharon Tate who was killed with her unborn child by the Charles Manson family. I find the act disgusting, but the girl’s mother put her daughter together with the director and at the end of the trial where an agreement had been reached on punishment, the judge attempted to suspend the deal and send Polanski to prison for a long time, so he left the country. (It should also be noted that the woman involved would like the matter ended in Polanski’s favor.) Rebecca always argued that Polanski should be caught and sent to jail.
Allen of course, has been seriously alleged to have molested one of then girlfriend’s adopted children and then left Ms. Farrow to marry another adopted daughter, many years Woody Allen’s junior. So far, the occurrence has not stopped me from watching a Roman Polanski film. A documentary called Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired made quite a compelling case that at the very least, Polanski was going to be railroaded. On the other hand, I watched the documentary “Allen v. Farrow” and have an even worse opinion of Allen. Now, I can only watch Annie Hall, and Hannah and Her Sisters. All of his other films, especially the ones where his character is involved with a much younger woman, turn my stomach.
Why am I bringing this up and why now? Long time readers know that I am a huge fan of the Chicago Blackhawks. For many years, I shared partial season tickets with a group of friends and watched many games including playoff and a couple Stanley Cup Finals games. I thoroughly enjoyed the 3 Cup championship teams. The friend who bought the season tickets each year retired and I took over the tickets. Of course, it has been hard to be a Blackhawk fans since they last won in 2015. The team has played poorly as the old core aged and retired or left. Worse yet was the fact that the Blackhawks allowed a pedophile to work as a video assistant during the 2010 title run. Rather than turn the criminal in, they waited until after the playoffs and paid for him to resign plus gave him championship gifts like the other employees. They never went to the police.
The young prospect, named Kyle Beach sued the team in 2019 along with another young man who had been molested after the video coach was working for a Michigan high school. The story reached the press and the Blackhawks hired a law firm to investigate the allegation. Rather than issue a whitewash report to use in the litigation, the report was scathing and honest. After that report was issued, Stan Bowman, the Head of Hockey Operations and GM resigned. John McDonaugh, had been fired by te organization awhile ago. Then Coach Joel Quenneville resigned his head coaching job with the Florida Panthers. An settlement was made with Beach, the other lawsuit was thrown out, but there were three people preparing more lawsuits as of this writing.
I already wrote about Owner Rocky Wirtz’ unseemly tirade at the team’s town hall meeting on Wednesday. He refused to answer any questions although the questions involved what controls had been put in place since the incident. The rant went viral and was met with universal derision. Both Rocky and son Danny issued apologies. Wayne Gretzky on TNT said that he would be unwilling to let a son if he had one come and play for the Blackhawks. Some fans said that they would never follow the team again. Some people threw away their jerseys and other paraphernalia. Therein lies the quandary – what should I do?
When the allegations came to light, I did not throw away my 2010 Championship shirts or hats. I did not throw away the replica championship ring I bought, nor any of the 2013 or 2015 championship swag. How should I feel about the team now that Rocky Wirtz has shown his true colors? Sports team owners are usually known as unpleasant, spoiled brats playing fantasy sports with real humans. Here is Chicago, we have the Cubs owned by the Ricketts family who’s father can be considered nearly a Nazi and he and his sons all are Trump supporters. The White Sox and Bulls are owned by Jerry Reinsdorf who held the State of Illinois hostage for what is now Guaranteed Rate Field. The Bears are owned by the McCaskey Family, who have mismanaged the team for decades and now want to move the team to suburban Arlington Heights.
For the Hawks, I have a little bit more experience actually. As an Andy Frain usher, I worked at the old Chicago Stadium. Aisle 10, right behind the benches near center ice was Aisle 10, where the Wirtzes sat. There was one very clean-cut usher who exclusively worked Aisle 10, but occasionally he couldn’t work and so a few times, I worked the Aisle. I was never comfortable there – very little was said to me whereas the regular usher was treated better, spoken to, acknowledged. I was not, but it was OK, these were some stuck up people. I met Rocky’s grandfather Arthur and his wife, the man who bought the Hawks; I was around Rocky’s father Bill, later known as “Dollar Bill” for his penny-pinching ways after his father passed. It was only when Bill died and Rocky took over that the team leapt into the 21st Century. Games were televised; beloved veterans were invited back to be community ambassadors. And of course, there was the winning – the first Stanley Cup wins since 1962. A book, The Breakaway detailed the Wirtz family from Rocky’s perspective, a cold, loveless family – a Dickensian nightmare mixed with the family on “Succession.”
The answer – I don’t think I can cut off the Blackhawks. I have been a fan since the 1960s, even when Black people generally didn’t go to games due to a feeling of being unwelcome. I am a hockey fan, when the Hawks were lousy, I still had the NHL Center Ice package on cable so I could see every game. I have been to a Dallas Cowboys game despite the fact that I was giving money to Jerry Jones. Same for the Yankees when George Steinbrenner was still alive. I have been to White Sox, Bulls and Cub games, but admittedly, not since the Ricketts took over. That Rocky Wirtz has similar traits as his father and grandfather probably shouldn’t be a surprise. Even with my inside knowledge, it never stopped me from going to games. The horrible days in the 1990s when the Hawks sucked kept me away just to keep money away from the Wirtzes when they put a subquality product on the ice.